This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Wapnick, J. Articles by Darrow, A.-A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Effects of Selected Variables on Musicians’ Ratings of High-Level Piano Performances

Charlene Ryan

Nathalie Lacaille

McGill University, Montreal

Alice-Ann Darrow

Florida State University

The purpose of this study was to ascertain whether judgments of solo performances recorded at a well-known international piano competition would be affected by musical characteristics such as style (classic period versus early 20th-century Russian) and tempo (slow versus fast). Evaluators rated performances on six test items: tone quality, note accuracy, rhythmic accuracy, expressiveness, adherence to style and overall impression. The effects of four between-subjects variables were examined: audio versus audiovisual presentation, undergraduate versus graduate/faculty, gender, and pianists versus non-pianists.

Results from the 227 evaluators revealed main effects for treatment, style and major: audiovisual presentations were rated higher than audio only presentations, performances of Russian music were rated higher than performances of classic music, and pianists rated performances higher than did non-pianists. The treatment effect was due to a significant treatment by major interaction, and applied only to non-pianists. Gender was involved in a number of three- and four-way interactions that are difficult to interpret.

Pearson r correlations were calculated for ratings of the 16 performances on the overall impression test item. The mean correlation for the 120 pairs of ratings was .33 – low but statistically significant. Intraclass correlations revealed no significant differences between the two levels of all four between-subjects variables.

Key Words: adjudication • competitions • evaluation • piano

International Journal of Music Education, Vol. 22, No. 1, 7-20 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0255761404042371


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Napoles The Effects of Score Use on Musicians' Ratings of Choral Performances Journal of Research in Music Education, October 1, 2009; 57(3): 267 - 279. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. J. Bergee Performer, Rater, Occasion, and Sequence as Sources of Variability in Music Performance Assessment Journal of Research in Music Education, December 1, 2007; 55(4): 344 - 358. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Ryan, J. Wapnick, N. Lacaille, and A.-A. Darrow The effects of various physical characteristics of high-level performers on adjudicators' performance ratings Psychology of Music, October 1, 2006; 34(4): 559 - 572. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Wapnick, C. Ryan, L. Campbell, P. Deek, R. Lemire, and A.-A. Darrow Effects of Excerpt Tempo and Duration on Musicians' Ratings of High-Level Piano Performances Journal of Research in Music Education, January 1, 2005; 53(2): 162 - 176. [Abstract] [PDF]